Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Rush v. Smith et al
as 2:2008cv05207
Plaintiff:
Norman Rush and Norman Rush
Defendant:
Eugenia Yvonne Smith, Eugenia Yvonne Smith, Metropolitan Lloyds Insurance Company of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Ada Ron-Messer v. Timothy Kaine
as 08-2090
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADA L. RON-MESSER
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY MICHAEL KAINE, Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia in his individual capacity, MARK R. WARNER, former Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, acting in his individual capacity, JUDITH W. JAGDMANN, Deputy Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia, acting in her individual capacity and others
Ron-Messer v. Kaine et al
as 3:2008cv00488
Plaintiff:
Ada L. Ron-Messer
Defendant:
Timothy M. Kaine, Mark R. Warner, Judith W. Jagdmann and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Raheem Taylor v. State of NJ, et al
as 08-2774
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAHEEM TAYLOR
Defendant:
STATE OF NJ, EDWIN H. STERN, Presiding Judge for Administrator, PHILIP S. CARCHMAN and others
TAYLOR v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2008cv02308
Plaintiff:
RAHEEM TAYLOR
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, EDWIN H. STERN, PHILIP S. CARCHMAN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BAKER v. WITTEVRONGEL et al
as 2:2008cv00301
Plaintiff:
RALPH BAKER
Defendant:
RALPH WITTEVRONGEL, UNION POLICE DEPT., EDWARD CHABEK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CALHOUN v. YOUNG et al
as 3:2007cv03691
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEE CALHOUN
Defendant:
KEVIN YOUNG, FRANCISCO GONZALEZ and YVONNE SMITH-SEGARS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER et al v. A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv66841
Plaintiff:
PERRY L. BUTLER, SR., ROSALIND BUTLER, NORMAN R. CLOCKER and others
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC., AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC, AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
