Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 50,668
Rettstatt v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00515
Plaintiff: William Joseph Rettstatt
Defendant: Dexter Payne, Joe Page, III, Micheal Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Adams et al
as 1:2024cv01683
Plaintiff: Barry White
Defendant: William Adams, Carol Adams, Adams Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Newland v. Uhl et al
as 2:2024cv00101
Plaintiff: Keith Newland
Defendant: Adam Uhl and Covington Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington v. Douglas
as 2:2024cv11573
Petitioner: Kalvin Lamar Washington
Respondent: Adam Douglas
Kutas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00570
Plaintiff: Adam Christopher Kutas
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Abadi v. Adams
as 24-1608
Plaintiff: AARON ABADI
Defendant: ERIC ADAMS, in his personal capacity, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, BILL DE BLASIO, in his personal capacity and others
Eric Johnson, et al v. David Mazie, et al
as 24-2056
Plaintiff: ERIC JOHNSON
Defendant: DAVID A. MAZIE, ADAM M. SLATER and MAZIE SLATER KATZ & FREEMAN LLC
Carmelo Giuffre v. North American Spine LLC, et al
as 24-2073
Plaintiff: CARMELO JOHN GIUFFRE
Defendant: NORTH AMERICAN SPINE LLC, DAMON J. NOTO, MD, SPINE & JOINT CENTER and others
Hagen v. Converse County Detention Center Captain et al
as 1:2024cv00123
Defendant: Converse County Detention Center Captain, Converse County Detention Center Sargeant Bright, Converse County Detention Center Sargeant Orsmeth and others
Plaintiff: Cameron Hagen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dodd v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06373
Plaintiff: Jacob Adam Dodd and May Dodd
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?