Cases 51 - 60 of 160
Butler v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2018cv01209
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Butler
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Debbie Knuer, L Ojelade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donelson v. Pfister et al
as 1:2018cv01117
Plaintiff:
Charles Donelson
Defendant:
Randy Pfister, Donald Gish, Angelica Joyner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Geoffrey Gish v. USA
as 17-15291
Petitioner - Appellant:
GEOFFREY A. GISH
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lee v Melvin et al
as 1:2017cv01522
Plaintiff:
Jessie Lee
Defendant:
Michael P Melvin, . Maxfield, . Dillon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marijane Gish v. Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 5:2017cv01014
Plaintiff:
Marijane Gish
Defendant:
Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Vigen et al v. Boston Scientific Corp. et al
as 2:2017cv03742
Plaintiff:
Sue Vigen , Tina Fitzpatrick , Janet Garrett and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp. and Doe Manufacturers 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Butler et al v. Moreland et al
as 1:2017cv01323
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Butler
Defendant:
. Moreland, . Gish, . Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Skaggs-Manuel et al et al v. Schroetlin et al
as 1:2017cv01633
Plaintiff:
Julie Christine Skaggs-Manuel and Julie (I) Christine Skaggs-Manuel
Defendant:
Brett (I) Schroetlin , Brett Schroetlin , Heather (I) Gish and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2017cv01257
Plaintiff:
Jessie R Lee
Defendant:
John Baldwin, . Hardy, Randy Pfister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vigen et al v. Boston Scientific Corp. et al
as 4:2017cv01431
Plaintiff:
Sue Vigen , Tina Fitzpatrick , Janet Garrett and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp. and Doe Manufacturers 1 - 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
