Cases 51 - 60 of 39,686
Draper v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00276
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Martin O
Plaintiff:
Ayden Draper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rakes v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00277
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Martin O
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Rakes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Fischer v. Dinges et al
as 4:2024cv02223
Plaintiff:
Leon A. Fischer
Defendant:
Dan O. Dinges, Scott C. Schroeder, Phillip L. Stalnaker and others
Turner #925863 v. Schroeder et al
as 2:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Jalen Torriano Turner #925863
Defendant:
Sarah Schroeder, Unknown Nebel, Unknown Sebaly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Review of Judicial Administrative Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Review of Judicial Administrative Decision
Rodriguez v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
Oscar O Rodriguez
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Barfield v. Hayes et al
as 1:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Zachary Barfield
Defendant:
C/O Hayes and C/O Gaffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hooks et al v. US Postal Service et al
as 4:2024cv00537
Plaintiff:
Kelly A. Hooks and Jess M. Spray, Jr.
Defendant:
US Postal Service and John Doe (4:24-CV-537-O)
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Hazen v. Lear et al
as 3:2024cv00584
Plaintiff:
Mason R Hazen
Defendant:
Trey D Lear, Blake Gruny, Bradley M Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
