Cases 51 - 60 of 2,433
Moore et al v. One Unnamed VA Nurse et al
as 5:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Shanin A Moore
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs, One Unnamed VA Nurse, Two Unnamed VA Police Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Olsen #119876 v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
Troy Timothy Olsen
Defendant:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phoenix et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00486
Defendant:
The 3M Company, DuPont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Phoenix, Christine April Martinez, Orlando Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Olsen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00709
Plaintiff:
Frederick James Olsen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hogan, Philip v. Olsen, Wayne et al
as 3:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Philip C. Hogan
Defendant:
Wayne Olsen, Mr. J. Aubihl, C.O. Matthew Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meadows et al v. Haws et al
as 2:2024cv00859
Plaintiff:
Veronica Ruiz Meadows and GrandMaster G-Man Meadows
Defendant:
David Haws, Barry L Olsen, Estate of Darrell Davis/Jodi McCallister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burch v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2024cv05286
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Burch
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Byrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael D. Arthurs v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02714
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Arthurs
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC Company Corporation doing business as Mr. Cooper, Jay Bray, Busy Burr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
