Cases 51 - 60 of 89
US v. Marquis Nelson
as 13-7707
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARQUIS ANTHONY NELSON, a/k/a Marquis L. Nelson
Nelson v. Scott et al
as 1:2013cv05998
Plaintiff:
Anthony Nelson
Defendant:
Marion Scott, Herb Freedman, Vernon Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nelson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv04507
Defendant:
City of New York, John and Jane Doe 1 through 10, and Police Officer Michael Mundy
Plaintiff:
Anthony Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Life Insurance Company of North America v. Michelle Mangas et al
as 2:2013cv03443
Defendant:
Does, J. M., Christopher Mangas and others
Plaintiff:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Nelson v. Overton County Justice Center et al
as 2:2013cv00038
Plaintiff:
Anthony Nelson
Defendant:
Overton County Justice Center, Rodney Phillips, Judy Paragon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heard #252329 et al v. Finco et al
as 1:2013cv00373
Plaintiff:
Lamont Heard #252329, William Johnson #235820, Jamero T. Moses #231885 and others
Defendant:
Tom Finco , Mike Martin and Brad Purves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Putnam County Justice Center et al
as 2:2013cv00029
Plaintiff:
Anthony Nelson
Defendant:
Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heard et al v. Finco et al
as 2:2013cv11342
Plaintiff:
Lamont Heard, William Johnson, Jamero Moses and others
Defendant:
Tom Finco, Mike Martin and Brad Purves
Nelson v. Echeveria et al
as 1:2012cv10392
Plaintiff:
Anthony Nelson
Defendant:
C.F. Echeverria, Officer Kalamaris, Alicea Alamo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Nelson v. Harvey et al
as 2:2012cv00120
Plaintiff:
Anthony Nelson
Defendant:
Shannon Harvey, W. B. Melton, Ethan Bean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
