Cases 51 - 60 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv04756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Harrelson v. Howell et al
as 5:2025ct03184
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thomas Harrelson
Defendant:
Warden L. Howell, AWP V. Devane, Britney Booker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv01017
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Wilkerson v. Angiodynamics, Inc. et al
as 3:2025cv02063
Plaintiff:
Britney Wilkerson
Defendant:
Angiodynamics, Inc. and Navilyst Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Harrelson v. NCDAC et al
as 5:2025ct03172
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thomas Harrelson
Defendant:
NCDAC, Warden L. Howell, AWP V. Devane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chatman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 4:2025cv03307
Plaintiff:
Britney Chatman
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Fetch! Pet Care, Inc. v. Atomic Pawz Inc., et al
as 25-1638
Plaintiff:
FETCH! PET CARE, INC.
Defendant:
ATOMIC PAWZ INC., BRITNEY BILLINGS, CAERULEAN, LLC and others
Matthews v. Huner et al
as 2:2025cv03697
Plaintiff:
Guy Matthews
Defendant:
Britney Huner, CHCA-Medical, Letizio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rizzo, et al. v. Stephens
as 1:2025cv00384
Plaintiff:
Carl Rizzo, Viola Josephine Rizzo, Britney Robertson and others
Defendant:
Kayla Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
