Cases 51 - 60 of 94
Ramirez et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv22418
Plaintiff:
Indalecia G. Ramirez and Jose C. Ramirez, Sr.
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Ramirez, Jr. et al
as 1:2013cv03518
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Agustin Ramirez, Jr., Agustin C. Ramirez, Sr., Christina Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Mortgage Foreclosure
Bompers v. Brown et al
as 7:2013cv00032
Plaintiff:
John Bompers
Defendant:
Sheriff Dan Brown, Sara Brown, Hugo Carrasco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leonardo Ramirez, Sr., et al v. Michael Schmidt
as 13-40264
Debtor:
In the Matter of: LEONARDO RAMIREZ, SR. and ANITA C. RAMIREZ
Appellant:
LEONARDO RAMIREZ, SR., ANITA C. RAMIREZ, LEONARDO RAMIREZ, JR. and others
Appellee:
MICHAEL B. SCHMIDT, U.S. Trustee
USA v. Wbaldo Coronado-Ramirez
as 12-1693
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
WBALDO C. RAMIREZ
USA v. Juan Ramirez-Fuente
as 12-1494
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JUAN C. RAMIREZ-FUENTES
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Ramirez
as 4:2011cv00227
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Martin C. Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Ramirez v. USA
as 3:2011cv00719
Petitioner:
Israel C Ramirez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Peyton v. United States District Court Northern District of Texas, et al
as 4:2011cv00569
Plaintiff:
Melvin Peyton
Defendant:
United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Terry R Means, Jorge A Solis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edd Christopher Rogers v. State of California et al
as 2:2011cv06506
Defendant:
Bernal, California Dept of Adult Parole Operations, California Dept of Corrections and Rehabilitations and others
Plaintiff:
Edd Christopher Rogers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
