Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 693
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01128
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
MULCH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv12371
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL MULCH
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kennan v. Brown et al
as 9:2023cv02313
Plaintiff: Christopher Michael Kennan
Defendant: Sgt. Montgomery, Kenneth Sharp, William Brightharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
ROBERTSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11795
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL ROBERTSON
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rowland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv02587
Plaintiff: Christopher Michael Rowland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Christopher Cline
as 23-6511
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL CLINE, a/k/a Carisa Cline
Girdlestone v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00433
Plaintiff: Christopher Michael Girdlestone
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Pelletier v. Neves et al
as 3:2023cv00150
Plaintiff: Christopher Michael Pelletier
Defendant: Judge Kerry Neves, John D. Kinard, Nicole Olsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael v. Lewis
as 4:2023cv00009
Petitioner: Christopher Michael
Respondent: Officer Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mitchell v. O'Donnell et al
as 4:2023cv00152
Plaintiff: Christopher Michael Mitchell and Christopher Lavelle Mitchell
Defendant: Elizabeth O'Donnell, Amy Devine and Caleb Copley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?