Cases 51 - 60 of 414
Jones v. Kohlmann
as 4:2021cv01142
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jones, Sr
Defendant:
Lauren Kohlmann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Kohlmann
as 5:2021cv05202
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Lauren Kohlmann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Empls Ret Sys of St. Louis, et al v. Charles Jones, et al
as 21-3993
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Derivatively on behalf of FirstEnergy Corp., ELECTRICAL WORKERS PENSION FUND, LOCAL 103, I.B.E.W., Co-Lead Plaintiff - Case No. 2:20-cv-5128, MASSACHUSETTS LABORERS PENSION FUND, Derivatively on Behalf of FirstEnergy Corp. Case No. 2:20-cv-5237 and others
Defendant:
CHARLES E. JONES
Defendant / Appellant:
FIRSTENERGY CORP and FIRSTENERGY CORP.
Jones v. Temptation Tours, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00412
Plaintiff:
Charles Adam Jones
Defendant:
Temptation Tours, Inc. a Hawaii Corporation doing business as Temptationtours.com and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Jones v. Cooper et al
as 6:2021cv02213
Plaintiff:
Thomas Charles Felton Jones
Defendant:
Deputy Jonathan Cooper, Deputy James Berggrun, Deputy Charles Lancaster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Caperton et al
as 1:2021cv00047
Plaintiff:
Charles Michael Jones
Defendant:
Eric Caperton, Zach Ferguson and Lawrence County, TN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Dunn v. Elizabeth Post, et al
as 21-1476
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF GLADWIN, MI, DARLENE JUNGMAN, ELIZABETH POST, Magistrate, individually and in her official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS EARL DUNN
Jones v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00553
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Plaintiff:
Charles J Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Thomas Dunn v. Elizabeth Post, et al
as 21-1412
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF GLADWIN, MI, DARLENE JUNGMAN, ELIZABETH POST, Magistrate, individually and in her official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS EARL DUNN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
