Cases 51 - 60 of 95
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv01554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Banks v. US Steel Tubular Products Inc (DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE)
as 4:2013mc01072
Plaintiff:
Caliph D Banks
Defendant:
US Steel Tubular Products Inc
Banks v. Bradley et al
as 1:2013cv00063
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Banks
Defendant:
Bonita J. Bradley and Geico General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
USA v. Banks
as 8:2013mc00155
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Marshall D. Banks
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Elliott v. Banks et al
as 3:2013cv00226
Defendant:
Roger D. Banks , R. Aaron Banks and Member Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Elliott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Banks v. Clarke
as 1:2012cv01398
Petitioner:
Reginald D. Banks
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee, II v. City of Seatac Police Department et al
as 2:2012cv01948
Plaintiff:
Shannon A Lee, II
Defendant:
City of Seatac Police Department, Brian Taylor, Joel D Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Banks v. Atchison et al
as 1:2012cv07795
Petitioner:
Nathaniel D. Banks
Respondent:
Michael Atchison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
The Bank of New York Mellon v. Banks et al
as 1:2012cv07767
Plaintiff:
The Bank of New York Mellon
Defendant:
Robert D. Banks, Arrow Financial Services LLC, Midland Credit Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Mortgage Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
