Cases 51 - 60 of 65
Copeland v. Barrow
as 1:2009cv01893
Petitioner:
Reggie D. Copeland
Respondent:
Donald Barrow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Charles Copeland v. John Potter, et al
as 09-3741
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES D. COPELAND
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN E. POTTER, Post Master General, AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION AFL-CIO, U.S. POSTAL SERVICE LABOR RELATIONS DEPARTMENT and others
Charles Copeland v. IRS
as 09-3631
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES D. COPELAND
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, ACS Support-Stop 813G
Battle v. Copeland et al
as 1:2009cv01358
Plaintiff:
Otis Battle
Defendant:
Lisa D. Copeland and Tiffany Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv04096
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Copeland v. Potter
as 5:2009cv00864
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Copeland
Defendant:
John E. Potter
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Smalls v. Colasanti & Iurato, LLP et al
as 7:2009cv00495
Plaintiff:
Patricia A. Smalls
Defendant:
Colasanti & Iurato, LLP, Glen Iurato, B.A.R. Entertainment Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Copeland v. I.R.S. ACS Support-Stop 813G
as 5:2008cv02768
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Copeland
Defendant:
I.R.S. ACS Support-Stop 813G
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
United States of America v. Copeland et al
as 2:2008cv03065
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Dennis D Copeland and Legal Couriers Inc
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Copeland et al v. Brown-West, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2008cv00251
Plaintiff:
Jerry M. Copeland and Deborah D. Copeland
Defendant:
Brown-West, L.L.C. and CCA Global Partners, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
