Cases 51 - 60 of 135
LAUREL GARDENS, LLC et al v. MCKENNA et al
as 5:2017cv00570
Plaintiff:
LAUREL GARDENS, LLC , AMERICAN WINTER SERVICES, LLC , LAUREL GARDEN HOLDINGS, LLC and others
Defendant:
TIMOTHY MCKENNA, MICHAEL MCKENNA, MAT SITE MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
DIDONATO v. IMAGINE ONE TECHNOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, LTD
as 3:2016cv00894
Plaintiff:
Loretta Didonato
Defendant:
Imagine One Technology & Management, Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Didonato v. Fisher et al
as 1:2016cv02607
Plaintiff:
Christine M. Didonato
Defendant:
Russ Fisher , Village of Lodi and Keith Keough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DiDonato et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2016dp20147
Plaintiff:
Dennis DiDonato and Susan DiDonato
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOPEZ et al v. DIDONATO et al
as 3:2016cv02939
Plaintiff:
EDWIN LOPEZ and MERCEDES LOPEZ
Defendant:
ROSE DIDONATO , PAUL DIDONATO , VICTORIA DIDONATO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FIORENTINO v. TOWN OF HAMMONTON et al
as 1:2016cv02019
Plaintiff:
MARK FIORENTINO
Defendant:
TOWN OF HAMMONTON , POLICE DEPARTMENT OF HAMMONTON , DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SERVICE OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miles v. DiDonato
as 3:2016cv00162
Plaintiff:
Jamie Leigh Miles
Defendant:
David DiDonato
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
DIDONATO v. SURGICAL SPECIALISTS, P.C.
as 2:2016cv01363
Plaintiff:
SANDRA DIDONATO
Defendant:
SURGICAL SPECIALISTS, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Capitol Payment Systems, Inc. v. Didonato et al
as 1:2016cv00882
Plaintiff:
Capitol Payment Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Pinnacle Processing Services, LLC and Salvatore DiDonato
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
BRAME v. REYNOLDS et al
as 2:2016cv01031
Plaintiff:
CHESTER BRAME
Defendant:
BRIAN REYNOLDS, JEFFREY WALKER, PERRY BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
