Cases 51 - 60 of 1,178
Kelton v. Nordstrom
as 24-50002
Plaintiff:
Randall Kelton and Kara Bell
Defendant:
Nordstrom, Incorporated, doing business as Nordstrom Rack, Kelsie Fucci, Nathan Hecht and others
Tay v. City of Tulsa et al
as 2:2023cv00932
Plaintiff:
Paul Tay
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, George Theron Bynum, Wendell Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 0640 Indian Tribal Rights
Cerny et al v. 3001 Caster, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv05035
Plaintiff:
Amanda Cerny, ARIANNY CELESTE LOPEZ, IESHA MARIE CRESPO and others
Petitioner:
Arabella Drummond
Defendant:
3001 Caster, LLC, LIEUTANT ANTHONY BOYLE and Brian David Clark
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Chiwanga v. Drummond
as 23-5136
Petitioner / Appellant:
JACKSON PETER CHIWANGA
Respondent / Appellee:
GENTNER F. DRUMMOND, Oklahoma Attorney General
Walter DrummondIn re: Walter Drummond
as 23-14021
Petitioner:
In re: WALTER DRUMMOND
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
IN RE: DRUMMOND
as 2:2023cv04768
In Re:
RONALD R. DRUMMOND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: DRUMMOND
as 2:2023cv04767
In Re:
RONALD R. DRUMMOND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DRUMMOND v. HUTCHINSON et al
as 1:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
KEITH DRUMMOND
Defendant:
WARDEN J. HUTCHINSON, FCI McKEAN FACILITIES DEPARTMENT HEAD, COMPOUND SUPERVISING OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lemmons v. Melody et al
as 4:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
Tobin Don Lemmons
Defendant:
Nurse Melody, Gentner Drummond, Administrative Head of State Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Vital Core Strategies
as 23-60599
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jacob Blair Scott
Defendant / Appellee:
Vital Core Strategies, Mike Ezell, Sheriff, individual and official capacity, Tyrone Nelson, Captain, individual and official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
