Cases 51 - 60 of 205,887
Newton v. G.E.O Group, Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Earl Nicholas Newton
Defendant:
G.E.O Group, Inc, C. O. Fields, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gutierrez et al v. Transportes de Carga Fema SA de CV et al
as 4:2024cv02103
Plaintiff:
Fernando M Gutierrez and Maria E Gutierrez
Defendant:
Transportes de Carga Fema SA de CV and Elizandro A Gallegos Leija
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Garst v. City of Virden et al
as 3:2024cv03141
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Garst
Defendant:
City of Virden and Harold E. Gist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Henson v. Calvary Christian School et al
as 3:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Jared Malachi Henson
Defendant:
Calvary Christian School, Calvary Christian Tabernacle Church, Charles Barcus and others
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Proffitt v. Westville Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2024cv00462
Plaintiff:
David Everett Proffitt and David E Proffitt
Defendant:
Westville Correctional Facility, John Galipeau, Kenny Gann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heriveaux v. The Addiction Rehabilitation Center
as 24-1508
Plaintiff:
MAGALY E. HERIVEAUX
Defendant:
THE ADDICTION REHABILITATION CENTER
Walker v. Wormuth
as 24-50448
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Walker
Defendant:
Christine E. Wormuth, Secretary of the Army
United States of America v. Benjamin, Gloria et al
as 3:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Gloria E. Benjamin and St. Croix Chippewa Indians Of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
BRADFORD v. WADAS
as 2:2024cv00271
Petitioner:
CHARLES E. BRADFORD
Respondent:
J. WADAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
