Cases 51 - 60 of 78
Hugler v. J.R. Ortiz, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01278
Plaintiff:
Edward C. Hugler
Defendant:
J.R. Ortiz Security Inc., Jesus Raul Ortiz Serrano and Yvonne Santana
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Hugler v. Design Development NYC, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01026
Defendant:
Earl Brian, Michael Daddio and Design Development NYC, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Edward C. Hugler
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hugler v. BH Drywall, Stucco & Painting Company Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv00544
Defendant:
BH Drywall, Stucco & Painting Company Incorporated, Troy Helm and Craig Helm
Plaintiff:
Edward C Hugler
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hugler v. Shivam of Wade, Inc. dba The Econo Lodge et al
as 5:2017cv00109
Plaintiff:
Edward C. Hugler
Defendant:
Shivam of Wade, Inc. dba The Econo Lodge and Kartik Patel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hugler v. Shivam of Wade, Inc. dba The Econo Lodge et al -
as 4:2017cv00023
Plaintiff:
Edward C. Hugler
Defendant:
Shivam of Wade, Inc. dba The Econo Lodge and Kartik Patel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hugler v. Advanced Urology of New Mexico
as 1:2017cv00247
Plaintiff:
Edward C. Hugler
Defendant:
Advanced Urology of New Mexico S/H 401 (K) Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Hugler v. Angel's Guard Protection Services, Inc.
as 3:2017cv01234
Petitioner:
Edward C. Hugler
Respondent:
Angel's Guard Protection Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Administrative Subpoena
Hugler v. Great White Construction, Inc
as 3:2017cv00180
Petitioner:
Edward C. Hugler
Respondent:
Great White Construction, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
Hugler v. Beltway Hospitality, LLC
as 1:2017cv01182
Plaintiff:
Edward C Hugler
Defendant:
Beltway Hospitality LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
