Cases 51 - 60 of 160
BERRY v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2018cv02644
Defendant:
RILEY GROOVER, WEXFORD HEALTH CARE, BARNS DOE and others
Plaintiff:
EARLIE B.A. BERRY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Chatham Counter Narcotics Team et al
as 4:2018cv00174
Defendant:
Judge Michael Karpf, The Federal Bureau of Investigation, Judge Penny Hass Freesemann and others
Plaintiff:
Jabbar M.A. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Groover v. Walmart, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01919
Plaintiff:
Ginger Groover
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jeffrey Emil Groover v. US
as 18-6158
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEFFREY EMIL GROOVER
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Groover v. Equifax Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04511
Plaintiff:
Patrick Groover
Defendant:
Equifax Inc , Richard F. Smith and John W. Gamble, Jr.
Movant:
Robert Brock and FRANKFURT-TRUST Investment GmbH
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Victor Tagle v. Kyle Groover
as 17-17226
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTOR MANUEL TAGLE, AKA Victor Manuel Tagle-Moreno
Defendant - Appellee:
KYLE GROOVER
Groover v. Equifax Inc. et al
as NYS/1:17-cv-07082
Plaintiff:
Patrick Groover
Defendant:
Equifax Inc. , Richard F. Smith and John W. Gamble, Jr.
Groover v. Equifax Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv07082
Plaintiff:
Patrick Groover
Defendant:
Equifax Inc., Richard F. Smith and John W. Gamble, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
IN RE EQUIFAX INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION
as 1:2017cv03463
Plaintiff:
Hampden Kuhns and Patrick Groover
Defendant:
Equifax Inc., Richard F. Smith, John W. Gamble, Jr. and others
Petitioner:
Robert Brock, FRANKFURT-TRUST Investment GmbH and Union Asset Management Holding AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steven Hunt v. Cynthia Groover, et al
as 17-14062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN LEONARD HUNT
Defendant - Appellee:
CYNTHIA GROOVER, KELLY GIVENS, TAMARA BENNETT THOMPSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
