Cases 51 - 60 of 113
Bashir v. Holzapfel et al
as 5:2023ct03143
Plaintiff:
El-Amin Bashir
Defendant:
Warden William Holzapfel, Unit Manager Chanelle Newsom, Case Manager Gilbert Grimaldo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Icker v. Nwude et al
as 5:2023ct03134
Plaintiff:
Mark Eric Icker
Defendant:
Dr. Michael Nwude, Alyssa Dowrich, Keri Tost and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Turner v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023hc02075
Petitioner:
Frederick Turner
Respondent:
Warden W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bashir v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023hc02053
Petitioner:
El-Amin Bashir
Respondent:
Warden William Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Glover v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023hc02044
Petitioner:
Demond Glover
Respondent:
Warden Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. MCF - St. Cloud
as 0:2022cv01299
Plaintiff:
Eugene Laron Johnson
Defendant:
MCF - St. Cloud, S. Holzapfel and A. Zamora
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pronin v. Penry et al
as 1:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Dmitry Pronin
Defendant:
S Penry, FNU Van Ness, FNU Tenner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McRae v. Carvajal, et al
as 21-1261
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN PLATO MCRAE
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, Federal Bureau of Prisons Director, C. CARTER, Warden of F.C.I. Florence, HOLZAPFEL, Assistant Warden and others
HOLZAPFEL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv30443
Plaintiff:
CHRISY BLUE HOLZAPFEL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Broadbent v. Nate Holzapfel LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00761
Plaintiff:
David K. Broadbent
Defendant:
Nate Holzapfel LLC and Nate Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
