Cases 51 - 60 of 298
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv02570
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Avazdavani v. Attorney General et al
as 1:2018cv23299
Defendant:
Attorney General, I.C.E. Deputy Director and Acting Director, Officer in Charge (OIC)for The Krome Service Processing Center and others
Plaintiff:
Milad Avazdavani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv07195
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 b
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06876
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Hoskins, Michael et al v. Deblanc et al
as 3:2018cv00578
Defendant:
C.O. Mchoney, Dr. Deblanc, Dr. Van Buren and others
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Hoskins
Undetermined:
WCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pactec, Inc. v. I.C.E. Service Group, Inc. et al (TWP2)
as 1:2018cv00118
Plaintiff:
Pactec, Inc.
Defendant:
I.C.E. Service Group, Inc., I.C.E. Packaging Company, LLC and Strategic Packaging Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
GEMCOR INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. I.C.E. TRANSPORT CO., INC. et al
as 2:2018cv08634
Plaintiff:
GEMCOR INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant:
I.C.E. TRANSPORT CO., INC. and ST. JOHN LOGISTICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv10156
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Morilus v. Immigration and Custom Enforcement (I.C.E.)
as 1:2018cv20112
Defendant:
Immigration and Custom Enforcement (I.C.E.)
Plaintiff:
Ronald Morilus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ying v. Immigration and Custom Enforcement (I.C.E.)
as 1:2018cv20093
Plaintiff:
Hu Ying
Defendant:
Immigration and Custom Enforcement (I.C.E.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
