Cases 51 - 60 of 768
(PC)Parker v. Redman et al
as 2:2022cv01838
Plaintiff:
Randall Parker
Defendant:
Gary Redman, J. Martin and Monivirin Son
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lyle v. Redman et al
as 2:2022cv01801
Plaintiff:
Michael William Lyle, Jr.
Defendant:
Gary Redman and J. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flemming et al v. Bates County Jail et al
as 4:2022cv00626
Plaintiff:
Antonio Flemming, Tavion Reshond Jones, Timothy S. Reed and others
Defendant:
Bates County Jail and Brant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bexar County v. Martin
as 22-2211
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BEXAR COUNTY, et al.
Defendant / Appellant:
ROWLAND J. MARTIN, JR., as Administrator and Individually as Heir to the Estate of Johnnie Mae King
Bravenec v. Martin
as 22-50822
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Edward Bravenec, et al.
Defendant / Appellant:
Rowland J. Martin, Jr.
Bravenec v. Martin
as 22-2191
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EDWARD BRAVENEC, et al.
Defendant / Appellant:
ROWLAND J. MARTIN, JR.
Parents Protecting Our Children, UA v. Eau Claire Area School District, Wisconsin et al
as 3:2022cv00508
Plaintiff:
Parents Protecting Our Children, UA
Defendant:
Eau Claire Area School District, Wisconsin, Tim Nordin, Lori Bica and others
Amicus Curiae:
Kristoffer J. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01968
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
MARTIN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17142
Plaintiff:
DANIEL J MARTIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bexar County v. Martin
as 22-50718
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Bexar County, City of San Antonio and San Antonio Independent School District
Defendant / Appellant:
Rowland J. Martin, Jr., as Administrator and Indivdually as Heir to the Estate of Johnnie Mae King
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
