Cases 51 - 60 of 557
Dante' Stone v. James Green
as 23-5182
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANTE' CORVETTE STONE
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMES DAVID GREEN, Warden
KALBER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02256
Plaintiff:
JAMES DAVID KALBER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DARBY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00657
Plaintiff:
JAMES DAVID DARBY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dante' Stone v. James Green, et al
as 23-5031
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANTE' CORVETTE STONE
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES DAVID GREEN, Warden, JAMES WHITT, Deputy Warden, PAUL CROUCH, Deputy Warden and others
Hochstetler v. The Government of Sumner County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
James David Hochstetler
Defendant:
The Government of Sumner County, Tennessee, City of Hendersonville, Tennessee, Hendersonville Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clarke v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv04332
Petitioner:
James David Clarke, Jr
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jeremy CarawayIn re: Jeremy Caraway
as 22-6034
Petitioner:
In re: JEREMY D. CARAWAY
Respondent:
JAMES DAVID GREEN, Warden
Clarke v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2022cv00492
Petitioner:
James David Clarke, Jr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
National Republican Senatorial Committee et al v. Federal Election Commission et al
as 1:2022cv00639
Plaintiff:
National Republican Senatorial Committee, National Republican Congressional Committee, James David Vance and others
Defendant:
Federal Election Commission, Allen J. Dickerson, Dara Lindenbaum and others
Harris v. Green
as 2:2022cv00131
Petitioner:
Carlos Harris
Respondent:
James David Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
