Cases 51 - 60 of 64
Cary et al v. Beseler et al
as 3:2009cv01051
Plaintiff:
Walter H. Cary, III, James Lewis Cottle, Jr., Adrian Joseph Lessard, III and others
Defendant:
Rick Beseler, Johnny Mack Smith, Carl Harter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Johnny Mack, Jr.
as 09-7902
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHNNY MACK, JR.
Kevin McDaniels v. US
as 09-6265
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN WAYNE MCDANIELS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Nickles et al v. Ledbetter et al
as 3:2009cv00090
Plaintiff:
Johnny Mack Nickles and Southern Electrical Retirement Fund
Defendant:
Mary Eunice Ledbetter and Becky Joan Smith-Dansby
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Holman v. Harris et al
as 6:2009cv00006
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Mack Holman
Defendant:
Betty Harris, Dr. Hueseim and Dr. Ed
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
King v. Wayne, County of et al
as 2:2008cv15120
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Mack King
Defendant:
Wayne, County of, Warren Evans, Terrance Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. Johnny Brown
as 08-7730
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHNNY MACK BROWN
Owens v. State of Florida
as 1:2008cv20704
Petitioner:
Johnnie Mack Owens
Respondent:
State of Florida and State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WADE ET AL. v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv76089
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY MACK WADE
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MACK v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv65668
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY MACK and JOHNNY MACK
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
