Cases 51 - 60 of 65
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv02819
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Prescott v. Paul Annetts, et al.
as 1:2009cv04435
Plaintiff:
Dexter Prescott
Defendant:
Paul Annetts and "John" Bruce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prescott v. Paul Annetts, et al.
as 7:2009cv04435
Plaintiff:
Dexter Prescott
Defendant:
Paul Annetts and "John" Bruce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bruce v. Astrue
as 4:2009cv00290
Plaintiff:
Michael John Bruce
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
McNair et al v. Marionette Park Police Department et al
as 1:2009cv01142
Plaintiff:
Derrik Jarrad McNair
Defendant:
Marionette Park Police Department, Thomas Brown and John Bruce
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dach et al v. City of Richmond et al
as 3:2009cv00171
Plaintiff:
Uriah Dach, Uriah Dach, Timothy Dach and others
Defendant:
City of Richmond, Louie Tirona, John Bruce and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Grinols v. The State of California et al
as 5:2008cv04936
Plaintiff:
John Bruce Grinols
Defendant:
The State of California, The State of Alaska and Santa Clara County Jail
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carter, et al v. Dubois, et al
as 08-2150
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN CARTER
Plaintiff:
RAUL CASANOVA, DEMOND HICKS, KEVIN BUSH and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD DUVAL, STEVEN AYALA, WILLIAM J. GROSSI and others
Defendant:
LARRY E. DUBOIS, DANIEL J. SULLIVAN, EDWARD KLOS and others
John Bruce v. Mississippi Rubber & Specialty, et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-77255
Defendant:
Mississippi Rubber & Specialty
Plaintiff:
John Bruce
SWANZY v. AMETEK, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85909
Plaintiff:
JOHN BRUCE SWANZY and JOHN BRUCE SWANZY
Defendant:
AMETEK, INC., AMETEK, INC., AQUA-CHEM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
