Cases 51 - 60 of 70
Hofland v. Cyr, et al
as 11-1824
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDALL B. HOFLAND, a/k/a R.B.H.
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN P. CYR, BRUCE A. CARDELLO, SUSAN CARBON and others
John Lynch v. Bob Peryam, et al
as 11-12899
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN LYNCH
Defendant - Appellee:
BOB PERYAM, Sheriff, PERYAM, Internal Affairs, TOMMY TAYLOR, Chief and others
Perkins et al v. Watson et al
as 5:2011cv00372
Plaintiff:
Lowell Perkins , Rena Perkins , Justin Perkins and others
Defendant:
Larry Todd Watson, Jason Sackery, City of Gallatin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins et al v. Watson et al
as 4:2011cv00372
Plaintiff:
Lowell Perkins , Rena Perkins , Justin Perkins and others
Defendant:
Larry Todd Watson, Jason Sackery, City of Gallatin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brims v. Dunn et al
as 7:2011cv00712
Plaintiff:
Edward Leon Brims
Defendant:
Dunn, All Ramapo Police Officials Sgt. Lt. & Captains, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dahdah v. Town of Burlington
as 1:2010cv11827
Plaintiff:
Bandali Dahdah
Defendant:
Town of Burlington, Fran Hart, Walter Bevis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alkurd et al v. Cavalier Home Builders, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv03694
Plaintiff:
Mohammad R. Alkurd, Natasha Ambo, Jessica Thornley and others
Defendant:
Cavalier Home Builders, LLC, Cavalier Homes, Inc., North American Catastrophe Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Hofland v. Cyr, et al
as 10-1880
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDALL B. HOFLAND, a/k/a R.B.H.
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN P. CYR, BRUCE A. CARDELLO, SUSAN CARBON and others
Lynch v. Peryam et al
as 1:2010cv22020
Plaintiff:
John Lynch
Defendant:
Bob Peryam, Ms. Peryam, Tommy Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muckle v. US, et al
as 10-1652
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL L. MUCKLE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES, GEORGE W. BUSH, BARACK OBAMA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
