Cases 51 - 60 of 300
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv04875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
WEILBACHER v. MCHUGH
as 1:2015cv00651
Petitioner:
ROBERT AARON WEILBACHER
Respondent:
JOHN M. MCHUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Filing Error
as 1:2015cv00678
Defendant:
JOHN M. McHUGH, Jo-Ellen Darcy, Thomas P. Bostick and others
Plaintiff:
John M McHugh
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of Ohio v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 1:2015cv00679
Plaintiff:
State of Ohio and Michael DeWine
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers , John M McHugh , Jo-Ellen Darcy and others
Intervenor:
Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Port Authority
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv03006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Notice Only Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Wong v. McHugh et.al.
as 3:2015cv01127
Plaintiff:
Connie Wong
Defendant:
John M. McHugh, Deborah Lee James, California Military Department and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00339
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Shelia Y. Cruthirds v. Karen Miller
as 15-1165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHELIA Y. CRUTHIRDS
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN MILLER, Division Chief Child Youth School Age Services/Directorate Family, Morale, Welfare and Recreation (CYSS/DFMWR) and JOHN M. MCHUGH, Secretary, Department of the Army
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
