Cases 51 - 60 of 142,247
Norton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
Melinda K. Norton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
C. et al v. HATBORO-HORSHAM SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 2:2024cv02605
Plaintiff:
R. C., C. K. and S. C.
Defendant:
HATBORO-HORSHAM SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Butts v. Raul Auto Sales
as 1:2024cv00979
Plaintiff:
Jody K. Butts
Defendant:
Raul Auto Sales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Upfield v. The Keyboard Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv02240
Plaintiff:
Darren Upfield
Defendant:
The Keyboard Corporation, The Keyboard Corporation a/k/a Keyboard Motorcycle Shipping, Keyboard Carriage, Inc., a Division of The Keyboard Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Magill v. MidFirst Bank (incorrectly named as MidFirst Bank a/k/a MidFirst Trust)
as 5:2024cv00663
Plaintiff:
David Magill
Defendant:
MidFirst Bank (incorrectly named as MidFirst Bank a/k/a MidFirst Trust)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv01025
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00849
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
USA v. Xang Sacksith
as 24-2096
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
XANG SACKSITH, a/k/a "T"
Robert Tlusty v. D. Swain, et al
as 24-11921
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. TLUSTY
Defendant:
D. SWAIN, Correctional Officer, K. DAVIS, Correctional Officer, J. ELLENBURG, Correctional Officer and others
In re: Naturalization Ceremony 06/25/2024
as 3:2024mc80145
Not Yet Classified:
Leonardo Mir Norouzi, Luis Alberto Angeles, Humberto Topete and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
