Cases 51 - 60 of 209
Stross v. Davis Real Estate Development LLC et al
as 1:2019cv22646
Defendant:
Hager Keith Davis and Davis Real Estate Development LLC
Plaintiff:
Alexander Bayonne Stross
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501
Davis v. Dart et al
as 1:2019cv04079
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart
Plaintiff:
Keith Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2019cv04080
Defendant:
Thomas, Garcia, Gubala and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv22263
Plaintiff:
Keith Davis
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DAVIS v. R A W CONSTRUCTION LLC
as 4:2019cv00165
Defendant:
R.A.W. CONSTRUCTION LLC and R A W CONSTRUCTION LLC
Plaintiff:
KEITH DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baum et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 3:2019cv01018
Plaintiff:
John Kalfayan, Terrence M. O'Neill, Lawrence Krupinski and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company, Wilbur-Ellis Feed, LLC and Wilbur-Ellis Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Russell et al
as 3:2018cv01205
Defendant:
Jay Russell and Lieutenant Holland
Plaintiff:
Keith Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS WARDEN et al
as 2:2018cv03033
Respondent:
PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS WARDEN, JUDGE NAZARIO JIMINEZ, THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT THIRD CIRCUIT AND ITS APPEALS COURT and others
Petitioner:
KEITH DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Keith Davis v. Anthony Eberling, et al
as 18-2033
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY E. EBERLING, LT. HOUSE, J. THOMAS and others
A. Doe et al v. Ludwigsen et al
as 2:2018cv00564
Plaintiff:
M. Doe, K. Doe, Y. Doe and others
Defendant:
Kurt Ludwigsen, Michael G. Scales, Kirsten Lambertson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
