Cases 51 - 60 of 176
Moon v. Rivas, et al
as 3:2015cv00891
Plaintiff:
Darnell W Moon
Defendant:
Henry Rivas, M. Neumann, Steven Cardona and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moon v. Walton et al
as 3:2015cv00889
Plaintiff:
Darnell W Moon
Defendant:
J.S. Walton, Henry Rivas, M. Neumann and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moon v. Samuels, et al
as 3:2015cv00876
Plaintiff:
Darnell Wesley Moon
Defendant:
D Scott Dodrill, Brian K Davis, Leslie Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moon v. Samuels Jr et al
as 3:2015cv00861
Plaintiff:
Darnell W Moon
Defendant:
Charles Samuels Jr, D Scott Dodrill, Brian K Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Miller v. Simmons et al
as 5:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
Robert Ethan Miller, Jr.
Defendant:
J. Simmons, John Doe Insurance Policies, Leslie Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Yassin Aref, et al v. Loretta Lynch, et al
as 15-5154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Yassin Muhiddin Aref, Kifah Jayyousi and Daniel McGowan
Defendant - Appellee:
Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General of the United States, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Director, Federal Bureau of Prisoners, D. Scott Dodrill, Assistant Director, Correctional Programs Division and others
Smith v. USA
as 6:2014cv03182
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Christopher Leslie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2014cv00122
Defendant:
MELISSA BAYLESS, J. F. CARAWAY, JOYCE K. CONLEY and others
Plaintiff:
KURT F. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fox v. Askren et al
as 1:2013cv00872
Plaintiff:
William D Fox
Defendant:
Denise A Askren , New Richmond Police Department and Leslie Smith
Counter_claimant:
Denise A Askren
Counter_defendant:
William D Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nosair v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2013cv01017
Plaintiff:
El-Sayyid Nosair
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Leslie Smith, D Scott Dodrill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
