Cases 51 - 60 of 447
Daniel Dragash v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, et al
as 21-13760
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL D. DRAGASH
Defendant / Appellee:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA, STEPHEN M. WALKER, CHARLES E. ROBERTS and others
El-Bey v. Walker et al
as 1:2021cv00679
Plaintiff:
Jttonali One Eye El-Bey
Defendant:
Bethany M Walker, Brittany D Nicely, Theresa Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Meyers v. D. Roundtree
as 21-7469
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
D. ROUNDTREE, Captain, FISCAL TECH KRUSE, J. RANDOLPH, Accountant and others
Harris v. Wayborn et al
as 4:2021cv01114
Plaintiff:
Charlton D. Harris
Defendant:
Sheriff FNU Wayborn, Officer FNU Ananti and Officer M. Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Target Corporation
as 1:2021cv00801
Plaintiff:
kyle M walker, Male and Kyle M. Walker
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dragash v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 8:2021cv01642
Plaintiff:
Daniel D. Dragash
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. Defendant., Stephen M. Walker, Charles E. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01048
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Louis Holger Eklund v. United States of America, Inc., et al
as 21-35442
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD J. TRUMP, FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, D. SPROUL, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS HOLGER EKLUND, AKA Louis Holger
David Meyers v. D. Roundtree
as 21-6723
Defendant / Appellee:
MARTIN BRYANT, Warden, FISCAL TECH KRUSE, A. BROWN, Intel Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Justin M Walker v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv03853
Plaintiff:
Justin M Walker
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
