Cases 51 - 60 of 93,372
Merriweather v. Davis
as 3:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Kendall Merriweather
Defendant:
Mark Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Mclaughlin v. Wyoming Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Tara Griffin Mclaughlin and Tara Griffin-Gardner
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, Scotts Bluff County Nebraska Sheriff, Scotts Bluff County Nebraska Sheriff's Department Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mark Gooding v. Parole Board, et al
as 24-1438
Petitioner:
MARK ANTHONY GOODING
Respondent:
PAROLE BOARD and MICHELLE FLOYD, Warden
Deuschel v. California Health and Human Services Agency, et al.
as 24-3129
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DEUSCHEL
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY and MARK GHALY
Christopherson v. Clarke
as 3:2024cv00351
Petitioner:
Mark Todd Christopherson
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fredricks v. Detective John Doe
as 24-1306
Plaintiff:
NIGEL FREDRICKS
Defendant:
Detective MICHAEL ARDOLINO, Detective DERRICK RUSS, Detective MARK SCARLATELLI and others
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 24-1309
Petitioner:
TOWAKI KOMATSU
Respondent:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, LISA FITZPATRICK, sued in their individual and official capacities, NIGEL MARKS, sued in their individual and official capacities and others
Dwayne Rieco v. Michael Zaken, et al
as 24-1882
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, MARK HAMMER, Physicians Assistant, WILLIAM NICHOLSON and others
Mark Adams v. USA, et al
as 24-1429
Plaintiff:
MARK ALAN ADAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF MICHIGAN, SAGINAW COUNTY, MI and others
Taylor v. Thornell, et al.
as 24-3114
Petitioner:
CAMERON LEEZELL TAYLOR
Respondent:
RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION, KRIS MAYES, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, DAVID SHINN, ADOC Director and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
