Cases 51 - 60 of 82
FITZGERALD v. BURNS et al
as 2:2013cv03959
Petitioner:
MICHAEL FITZGERALD
Respondent:
DANIEL P. BURNS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FITZGERALD v. BURNS et al
as 2:2013cv03417
Petitioner:
MICHAEL FITZGERALD
Respondent:
DANIEL P. BURNS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FITZGERALD v. BURNS et al
as 2:2013cv01009
Petitioner:
MICHAEL FITZGERALD
Respondent:
DANIEL P. BURNS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Michael Fitzgerald
as 13-3095
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL FITZGERALD
Michael Wilson v. John Fox
as 12-40927
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL FITZGERALD WILSON
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN FOX, Warden
Michael Fitzgerald Wilson v. Linda T McGrew
as 2:2012cv05366
Respondent:
Linda T McGrew
Petitioner:
Michael Fitzgerald Wilson
Scott Townley, et al v. K. Fitzgerald
as 12-60001
In Re:
In re: SCOTT C TOWNLEY and STEPHANIE TASHIRO-TOWNLEY
Appellant:
SCOTT C TOWNLEY and STEPHANIE TASHIRO-TOWNLEY
Appellee:
K. MICHAEL FITZGERALD, Trustee
Poynton et al v. Waterbury
as 3:2012cv00096
Plaintiff:
Troy Poynton, Michael Achlioptas, Marco Albino and others
Defendant:
City of Waterbury
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Young Song v. James Welch
as 11-6156
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YOUNG BOK SONG
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES WELCH, Police Officer, MICHAEL FITZGERALD, Police Officer and ROBERTO RIVERA, Police Officer
Young Song v. James Welch
as 10-7036
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YOUNG BOK SONG
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES WELCH, Police Officer, MICHAEL FITZGERALD, Police Officer and ROBERTO RIVERA, Police Officer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
