Cases 51 - 60 of 218
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv22382
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARK ALLEN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce v. A. O. Smith Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv02127
Defendant:
William P. Greubel, Gene C. Wulf, Ajita G. Rajendra and others
Nominal Defendant:
A. O. Smith Corporation
Plaintiff:
Ian Pierce
Pierce v. Rajendra et al
as 2:2019cv01199
Defendant:
Mark D Smith, Gloster B Current, Kevin Wheeler and others
Nominal Defendant:
AO Smith Corporation
Plaintiff:
Ian Pierce
Mark Smith v. Kate Bieker, et al
as 19-16381
Defendant / Appellee:
KATE BIEKER, Chief Executive Officer, Superior Court, County of Alameda and AFSCME LOCAL 2700
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
XAVIER BECCERA, Attorney General
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK R. SMITH
SIGNORELLO et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03246
Plaintiff:
CHADWICK SPARKS, CHILL TANNER, ANDREW SLYWZCUK and others
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, 3M COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Signorello et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02214
Plaintiff:
Aearo Intermediate, LLC, Chadwick Sparks, Chill Tanner and others
Defendant:
Aearo Holdings, LLC, 3M Company, 3M Occupational Safety, LLC and others
Smith v. Davis et al
as 6:2019cv00075
Defendant:
Lori Davis, Michael Britt, Pam Pace and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Shawn Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Town of Marshfield, et al
as 19-1155
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN C. ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. HALL, in his official capacity and individually, MARSHFIELD, MA and ROCCO LONGO, in his official capacity and individually
Interested Party:
MARK DAVID SMITH
The Mississippi Bar v. Smith
as 3:2019ad00003
Interested Party:
Katherine Alexander, Sandra E Campbell and Arthur Johnston
Respondent:
Mark R. Smith
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
