Cases 51 - 60 of 369
Teague v. Pike et al
as 5:2021ct03355
Plaintiff:
Charles O'Briien Teague and Charles O'Brien Teague
Defendant:
Marshall Pike, Jimmy Dorman and Scott Velasco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMPSON v. USA
as 1:2021cv00843
Petitioner:
RONALD MARSHALL SIMPSON, JR
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Banyan Licensing L.L.C. v. Marshalls of MA, Inc. d/b/a Marshalls
as 3:2021cv00572
Plaintiff:
Banyan Licensing L.L.C.
Defendant:
Marshalls of MA, Inc. d/b/a Marshalls and Marshalls of MA, Inc. doing business as Marshalls
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Taylor v. United States Marshal et al
as 5:2021ct03312
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Lamont Taylor
Defendant:
United States Marshal, United States Marshall Aaron and United States Marshall Michale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCALLISTER v. FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2021cv00786
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, BOBBY F. KIMBROUGH, ROCKY JOYNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOSKEY v. U.S. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2021cv00773
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL H. FOSKEY
Defendant:
U.S. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, JANET YELLEN, CHARLES P. RETTIG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Russell v. U.S. Marshal
as 5:2021hc02200
Petitioner:
Deondre Montreal Russell
Respondent:
U.S. Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Clervrain v. Marshall
as 3:2021cv00316
Defendant:
Elaine F. Marshall
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYLER v. GREENWOOD et al
as 1:2021cv00529
Defendant:
PAUL A. SHANNER, DYLAN W. GREENWOOD, J. CLARK FISCHER and others
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
