Cases 51 - 60 of 2,390
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kunzler v. Wilkie
as 24-732
Plaintiff:
JOHN KUNZLER
Defendant:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs and ROBERT WILKIE, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs
Schmalshof et al v. McDonough County, Illinois et al
as 3:2024cv03071
Plaintiff:
Evan Schmalshof and Schmalshof Family Transport LLC
Defendant:
McDonough County, Illinois and Nicholas Petitgout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hester v. Albany County District Attorney
as 24-570
Plaintiff:
RONALD L. HESTER
Defendant:
Det. JASON KELLY, Det. JOHN REGAN, Sgt. BRIAN PLANTE and others
Roy Perry-Bey v. Lloyd Austin, III
as 24-1234
Plaintiff:
ROY L. PERRY-BEY
Defendant:
LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense, DENIS R. MCDONOUGH, in his official capacity as Secretary of Veterans Affairs, CHRISTINE WORMUTH, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Army and others
Spengler v. McDonough
as 24-1581
Claimant:
JACK G. SPENGLER
Respondent:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Garrett et al v. Garland et al
as 6:2024cv03076
Plaintiff:
Dwayne M Garrett and Paul Leroy Wickham
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Mike Johnson, Eastern District of Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Williams v. McDonough
as 24-1576
Claimant:
LEWIS WILLIAMS
Respondent:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
SWANSON v. MCDONOUGH
as 1:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SWANSON
Defendant:
DENIS MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
