Cases 51 - 60 of 476
John Butler v. Howard Sissem, et al
as 22-1371
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN BUTLER
Defendant / Appellee:
HOWARD SISSEM, SGT DELANEY, sued in their individual capacities, JERI SMOCK and others
Marchetti et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2022cv10251
Plaintiff:
Joseph Marchetti, William Bernhard, Paul Berube and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(PS)Clark v. Allison et al
as 2:2022cv00190
Plaintiff:
Michael Clark
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Ken Clark, N. Scaife and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell Williams v. Michael Clark, et al
as 22-1068
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MITCHELL WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL CLARK and DANIEL STROUP
Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
Michael Clark
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision
Michael Faris, et al v. TSA
as 21-1221
Petitioner:
Michael Faris, Charity Anderson, Angela Byrd and others
Respondent:
Transportation Security Administration
Michael Faris, et al v. TSA
as 21-3951
Petitioner:
MICHAEL JAMES FARIS, CHARITY ANDERSON, ANGELA BYRD and others
Respondent:
TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv65025
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CLARK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. State Farm Lloyds
as 1:2021cv00934
Plaintiff:
Michael Clark
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Michael Clark Martin v. Group 1 Automotive, Inc., et al
as 5:2021cv00918
Plaintiff:
Michael Clark Martin
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC, Group 1 Automotive, Inc. and Maxwell-GMII, Inc. d/b/a Freedom Chevrolet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
