Cases 51 - 60 of 97
Frank v. Colvin
as 4:2015cv05079
Plaintiff:
Michael Frank
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Frank v. Harrison et al
as 3:2015cv00442
Plaintiff:
Alan Michael Frank
Defendant:
Kendrick Harrison, Hal MacMurdo, Sheena Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re: Hopeton Gooden
as 15-184
Movant:
In re: HOPETON GOODEN, a/k/a Richard Doleson, a/k/a Michael Frank Burke
:
Michael Burgess v. USA
as 15-12045
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL FRANK BURGESS
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Staples et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv07954
Plaintiff:
David A. Staples , Dave Staples Farm , Eric A. Thronson and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Staples et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as MN/0:15-cv-02023
Plaintiff:
David A. Staples , Dave Staples Farm , Eric A. Thronson and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Staples et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv02023
Plaintiff:
David A. Staples , Dave Staples Farm , Eric A. Thronson and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Niemi et al v. Burgess et al
as 1:2015mc00088
Plaintiff:
John Niemi , Robert Naegele III and Jesper Parnevik
Defendant:
Michael Frank Burgess, Erwin Lasshofer, Innovatis Gmbh and others
Cause Of Action: M 18-302 Registration of Foreign Judgment
Kafer v. McCollum
as 6:2015cv00038
Plaintiff:
Michael Frank Kafer
Defendant:
Tracy McCollum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brian Parker, et al v. ABC Debt Relief LTD Co.
as 14-11291
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRIAN PARKER, MICHAEL FRANK, JEREMY COZART and others
Defendant - Appellant:
LLOYD WARD P.C., doing business as Lloyd Ward & Associates
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
