Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 212
Radcliff v. Nanos et al
as 4:2022cv00055
Plaintiff: Christopher L Radcliff
Defendant: Christopher Nanos, Unknown Parties and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437
Remcoda, LLC v. Sumner et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00770
Plaintiff: Remcoda, LLC
Defendant: Mr. David Sumner, Sumner Group Health Limited, Mr. Robert Ekstedt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Terrence Bressi v. Pima County Board of Superviso, et al
as 22-15123
Plaintiff / Appellant: TERRENCE BRESSI
Defendant / Appellee: PIMA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, MARK NAPIER, Pima County Sheriff, in his individual and official capacities, CHRISTOPHER NANOS, Former Pima County Sheriff, in his individual capacity and others
Nano Mobile Healthcare, Inc. v. Kittle
as 1:2022cv10101
Plaintiff: Nano Mobile Healthcare, Inc.
Defendant: David Noah Kittle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Lewis et al v. Nanos et al
as 4:2021cv00557
Plaintiff: Anna Christine Lewis and Bradley Lewis
Defendant: Chris Nanos, Gilbert Caudillo, Michael Moseley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniella Gracia v. Christopher Nanos, et al
as 21-16902
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANIELLA MARIE GRACIA
Defendant / Appellee: CHRISTOPHER NANOS, Pima County Sheriff, OFELIA DORSEY, #7531, Correctional Officer and WILLIAM GRIMSEY, #6095, Correctional Sergeant
Garcia v. C And D Northfield LLC et al
as 1:2021cv06071
Plaintiff: Zosimo Mendiola Garcia
Defendant: C And D Northfield LLC, Taco Nano LLC, The Good Plate Hospitality Group, LLC and others
David Dovid Schick v. Nano-X Imaging LTD. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv08529
Plaintiff: David Dovid Schick
Defendant: Nano-X Imaging LTD., Nanox Imaging PLC., Nano-X Imaging, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re Nano-X Securities Litigation
as 1:2021cv05517
Plaintiff: Daniel P. McLaughlin
Defendant: Nano-X Imaging Ltd., Ran Poliakine, Tal Shank and others
Petitioner: Viswanatha K. Reddy, James W. Isenberg and Davian Holdings Limited
James III v. Nanos et al
as 4:2021cv00341
Petitioner: John Edwards James and John Edwards James, III
Respondent: Christopher Nanos and Tucson Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?