Cases 51 - 60 of 210
Price v. Noble
as 4:2018cv02966
Petitioner:
Earl A. Price, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Jeff Noble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Price, Jr. v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv09526
Plaintiff:
Aarence Anthony Price, Jr.
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Butler, et al v. Augustine, et al
as 2:2018cv08243
Plaintiff:
Mr. Jason Butler, Thomas C. Price, Jr. and Jason Butler
Defendant:
Enterprise Integration Corporation and Walter E. Augustine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Price v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company et al
as 1:2018cv00825
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Price, Jr.
Defendant:
Home-Owners Insurance Company and Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cryar v. Tenneco Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01052
Defendant:
Dennis J. Letham, James S. Metcalf, Brian J. Kesseler and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Cryar
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00465
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested_party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
DEAL v. SMITH et al
as 1:2018cv00321
Plaintiff:
ROGER LEE DEAL, SR.
Defendant:
PAULA SMITH, KENNTH PRICE, JR., BEVERLY PERDUE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00184
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested_party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00118
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested_party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
