Cases 51 - 60 of 195
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv06326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Smith v. Roger Williams Law School
as 21-1464
Defendant / Appellee:
ROGER WILLIAMS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JIMMY SMITH
Smith v. Roger Williams Law School, et al
as 21-1435
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM E. SMITH, Justice of the United States District Court as Chair of the RWU Law Board of Directors, OLIVIA MILONAS, MICHAEL YELONSKY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JIMMY SMITH, and similarly situated persons
Williams v. Lupo #10401 et al
as 1:2021cv02588
Defendant:
City of Chicago, P.O. Elyse Rodriguez #14262, P.O. Vincenzo Lupo #10401 and others
Plaintiff:
Rogers Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Roger Williams Law School
as 1:2021cv00190
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Smith
Defendant:
Roger Williams Law School
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00133
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Layrisson et al v. Lorio
as 2:2021xc00247
Plaintiff:
Mr. Jason Rogers Williams and Mr. Jean-Paul Layrisson
Defendant:
Ms. Erin F Lorio and Erin F. Lorio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv01743
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROGER WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SALAZAR v. WILLIAMS et al
as 3:2020cv00143
Plaintiff:
SALVADOR SALAZAR
Defendant:
ROGER WILLIAMS, TORIE TEETS and ATHENS CLARKE COUNTY GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 20-2082
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
