Cases 51 - 60 of 87
Albright (ID 99790) v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2012cv03235
Plaintiff:
Shannon Albright
Defendant:
Kansas Department of Corrections, Raymond Roberts and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grissom v. Roberts, et al
as 12-3255
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD GRISSOM
Defendant - Appellee:
RAY ROBERTS, Secretary of Corrections, in his official and individual capacity, RAYMOND ROBERTS, Warden, El Dorado Correctional Facility, in his official and individual capacity, LOUIS E. BRUCE, Former Warden, Hutchinson Correctional Facility, in his official and individual capacity and others
Rouse v. Conner et al
as 3:2012cv02121
Plaintiff:
Winslow C. Rouse
Defendant:
Raymond Robert Conner , Kathy Archuleta and Alameda County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Walmsley et al
as 5:2012cv03014
Plaintiff:
Marcus B. Washington
Defendant:
Brandon Walmsley, Gary Wilson, Raymond Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Roberts, et al
as 11-3379
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEROME EDWARDS
Respondent - Appellee:
RAYMOND ROBERTS, Former Warden, El Dorado Correctional Facility and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KANSAS
Collins v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 5:2011cv03151
Plaintiff:
Chase Corbin Collins
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Tina Nichols, (fnu) Harrod and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Roberts et al
as 5:2011cv03099
Petitioner:
Jerome Edwards
Respondent:
Raymond Roberts and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holderer v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2011cv00227
Plaintiff:
Raymond Robert Holderer
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United States of America v. Roberts
as 2:2011mj30118
Defendant:
Ronald Raymond Roberts
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
