Cases 51 - 60 of 584
RODDY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08096
Plaintiff:
CAROL RODDY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Clervrain v. Francis et al
as 1:2022cv02028
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Steve K. Francis, Roberta Reardon, Scott Melvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv02640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Morgan v. Averitt Express, Inc
as 4:2022cv01575
Plaintiff:
Roddie Morgan
Defendant:
Averitt Express, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Roddy L. Harrell et al v. Louisville Ladder, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00615
Plaintiff:
Roddy L Harrell, Susan Frishman Harrell, Holly Harrell and others
Defendant:
Louisville Ladder, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RODDY v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv02109
Defendant:
Trevor Roddy, 3M Company, 3M Occupational Safety LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Roddy v. USA
as 4:2021cv01244
Petitioner:
Alicia Lynn Roddy
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Murdock et al v. Guardian Life Insurance Co of America
as 1:2021cv03746
Plaintiff:
SANDRA MURDOCK, Roddy Sanders and Carmen Redmon Lemoine
Defendant:
Guardian Life Insurance Co of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dailey v. Bedford County, Tennessee et al
as 4:2021cv00046
Plaintiff:
Roger Glenn Dailey
Defendant:
Bedford County, Tennessee, Bedford County Sheriff Department, Kevin Roddy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
