Cases 51 - 60 of 67
Eleonora Miculs v. Brian Scott Bennett et al
as 2:2012cv02260
Defendant:
Brian Scott Bennett and Does
Plaintiff:
Eleonora Miculs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03230
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Steven Blomquist, et al v. Town of Marana, et al
as 11-16215
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN J. BLOMQUIST and SHARYL V. CUMMIGS, husband and wife
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWN OF MARANA, an Arizona municipal corporation, T.P. "TERRY" TOMETICH, JANE DOE TOMETICH, husband and wife and others
Berry v. Hudgins et al
as 3:2011cv00085
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Berry
Defendant:
T Hudgins and J Scott Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Favre et al v. Goldman Sachs, Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03757
Plaintiff:
Glenn Favre, Dale Capelouto and Allen Scott Bennett
Defendant:
Goldman Sachs, Holdings, Inc., Suntrust Bank Holdings, Inc, Fidelity National Financial Group, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Berry v. Bennett et al
as 3:2010cv02160
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Berry
Defendant:
Justin Scott Bennett and Dallas Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv05068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 (e)2(a) Family and Medical Leave Act
Scott Bennett et al v. Loves Travel Stops & Country Stores Inc et al
as 5:2009cv01459
Plaintiff:
Scott Bennett and Jeff Hoffman
Defendant:
Loves Travel Stops & Country Stores Inc, Loves Travel Stops & Country Stores Inc and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-5638
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.