Cases 51 - 60 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Matz v. Hays County et al
as 1:2026cv01985
Plaintiff:
Sarah Matz
Defendant:
Hays County and Alex Sparks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Blazevic et al v. Thermoworks, Inc.
as 2:2026cv02538
Plaintiff:
Sarah Blazevic and Marcus Humberg
Defendant:
Thermoworks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Perez v. Torres, et al
as 26-3156
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL PEREZ
Defendant:
STEVEN TORRES, MONICA TORRES, SHANNON MARTEN and others
Haas v. Isanti County et al
as 0:2026cv03337
Plaintiff:
David Kenneth Haas
Defendant:
Isanti County, Isanti County Health and Human Services, Connor Welle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In Re: Wang Litigation
as 26-1943
Plaintiff:
QIAN WANG, Sarah Wang, ZHANWEN CHI, on their own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
KIRIN TRANSPORTATION, INC., HEBEI TIANKAI FOUNDATION ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CO., LTD., QIANG CHEN and others
Mayanja v. City of Shoreline, et al.
as 26-4554
Plaintiff:
ISAAC NSEJJERE MAYANJA
Defendant:
CITY OF SHORELINE, SARAH ROBERTS, and her marital estate, EMMA VETTER, and her marital estate and others
Mason v. Seberger et al
as 3:2026cv03230
Plaintiff:
Brandon M Mason
Defendant:
Sarah Elizabeth Seberger, Jonathan Maniff, Meghan McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01568
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Abrahim Fata v. Joshua Young, et al
as 26-2739
Plaintiff:
ABRAHIM FATA
Defendant:
MICHELE BURRELL, OPEN RECORDS OFFICER, PIKE COUNTY CYS, GREG CHRISTINE, OPEN RECORDS OFFICER, PIKE COUNTY CYS, JORDAN DAVIS, OPEN RECORDS OFFICER, PIKE COUNTY CYS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
