Cases 51 - 60 of 64
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv04992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Huot v. Montana State Department of Child and Family Services et al
as 3:2016cv01767
Defendant:
Anaconda Family Resource Center, Cal Boyal, Susanne M. Clague and others
Plaintiff:
Safron Huot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woods v. Departmen of Child and Family Services et al
as 4:2014cv00094
Plaintiff:
Nikita Woods
Defendant:
Departmen of Child and Family Services, Ike Jessee, Sarah Grotbo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Tescher et al
as 2:2014cv00024
Plaintiff:
Muiria Armstrong
Defendant:
Jolyne Tescher, Rhonda Belgarde, Carolyn Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv24479
Plaintiff:
Susan Day and Darryl Day
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Day et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as WVS/2:13-cv-24479
Plaintiff:
Susan Day and Darryl Day
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
HOSPITALITY DEPOT LLC v. ISBELL
as 5:2013cv00198
Plaintiff:
HOSPITALITY DEPOT LLC
Defendant:
SUSAN DAY ISBELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Day et al v. Coloplast A/S et al
as 2:2012cv04863
Plaintiff:
Susan Day and Geoffrey Day
Defendant:
Coloplast A/S, Coloplast Corporation, Coloplast Manufacturing, US LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
