Cases 51 - 60 of 78
HUGHES v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2014cv02621
Plaintiff:
ROBERT T. HUGHES
Defendant:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
T. Hughes v. State of California
as 13-17495
Petitioner - Appellant:
T. HUGHES
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Kolm v. Hughes
as 1:2013cv13018
Plaintiff:
Lukas Kolm
Defendant:
Philip T. Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
T. Hughes v. USDC-CASF
as 13-73654
:
In re: T. HUGHES
Petitioner:
T. HUGHES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest:
CONNIE GIPSON, Warden
T. Hughes v. Connie Gipson
as 13-15561
Petitioner - Appellant:
T. HUGHES
Respondent - Appellee:
CONNIE GIPSON, Warden
Gibson v. Hughes et al
as 3:2013cv00078
Plaintiff:
Allen D. Gibson
Defendant:
Richard T. Hughes and R. Hughes Engineering, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Encompass Indemnity Company v. Hughes et al
as 4:2011cv01732
Plaintiff:
Encompass Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Daniel T Hughes, Jane Doe , Jean Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROSENBERG v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2011cv04150
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN H. ROSENBERG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC HOLDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 1:2011cv01323
Plaintiff:
Brian T. Hughes and Nicole Hughes
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association and Litton Loan Servicing, L.P.
Counter_claimant:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Counter_defendant:
Brian T. Hughes and Nicole Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Fifth Third Bank v. Hughes et al
as 3:2010cv01072
Plaintiff:
Fifth Third Bank
Defendant:
Ronald G. Hughes and Patricia T. Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
