Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 5,278
Sawyer et al v. Union Carbide Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00118
Plaintiff: Janya Sawyer , Garnette Morris , Nancy Pike and others
Defendant: Union Carbide Corporation , John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. , Owens-Illinois Glass Co., and others
Cross_claimant: John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. , Phelps Packing & Rubber Co. , J.H. France Refractories Co. and others
Cross_defendant: Bayer Cropscience, Inc. , CBS Corporation , Cooper Industries, Inc. and others
Thirdparty_defendant: General Refractories Co., Hopeman Brothers, A.W. Chesterton Company and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff: MCIC, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
In Re: Asbestos Products, et al
as 15-4058
Plaintiff - Appellant: SHIRLEY SPYCHALLA, Individually and As Special Administrator of the Estate of Leonard J. Spychalla, Deceased
Defendant - Appellee: AVCO CORP, ALLISON ENGINE CO, BOEING AEROSPACE OPERATIONS INC and others
Madaris et al v. Adel Wiggins, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01223
Defendant: Adel Wiggins, Inc., Bucyrus International, Inc., Dana Companies, LLC. and others
Counter Defendant: Flowserve Corp., Ameron International Corporation, Buffalo Pumps, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant: Lear Siegler Diversified Holding, Inc., Borgwagner Morse Tec, Inc., Hysol and others
Cross Claimant: Ingersoll Rand Company and General Electric Company
Plaintiff: James E Madaris, Jr and Sandra S Madaris
Counter Claimant: Industrial Holding Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
GROSSMAN et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv32653
Special Master: BRUCE LASSMAN, ESQ.
Plaintiff: JACOB A. GROSSMAN, WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC F/K/A NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Respondent: CONSTABLE HOOK SHIPYARDS INC and AMERADA HESS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688 Jones Act
Kelleher v. Boeing Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00893
Defendant: Beazer East, Inc., CBS Corporation, Industrial Holdings Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Thomas Kelleher
Cross Defendant: Sprinkmann Insulation Inc., United Technologies Corporation and Rohr Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Brumfield v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv14127
Plaintiff: William Brumfield
Defendant: Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. , John K. Kessinger, Jane S. McElreath and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cashio et al v. 3 M Co et al
as 1:2015cv02222
Plaintiff: Mark D Cashio and Kimberly W Cashio
Defendant: 3 M Co , Avco Corp , Bell Helicopter Textron Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steven Papp v. Fore-Kast Sales Co Inc, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-2851
Plaintiff - Appellee: STEVEN PAPP, individually and as Executor and Executor as Prosequendum of the Estate of MARY SUE PAPP
Defendant - Appellee: FORE-KAST SALES CO INC, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC, FKA Allied Signal Inc, as successor-in-interest to teh Bendix Corporation, NEW BRUNSWICK PLATING CO, FKA New Brunswick Nickel and Chrome Plating and others
Defendant - Appellant: BOEING CO, individually and as successor by merger to the McDonnell Douglas Corporation
Kenneth McAfee, et al v. 20th Century Gove Corp of Texa, et al
as 15-2667
Plaintiff - Appellant: KENNETH MCAFEE and SHIRLEY MCAFEE, H/W
Defendant - Appellee: 20TH CENTURY GOVE CORP OF TEXAS, A.O. SMITH CORPORATION, ALLEN SHERMAN HOFF and others
Defendant - Intervenor: ALLEN-BRADLEY CO
Helmer, et al v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1214
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID HELMER, FELICIA MUFTIC, MICHAEL MUFTIC and others
Defendant - Appellee: GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO., an Ohio corporation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?