Cases 51 - 60 of 74
Daniels v. USA
as 4:2014cv00320
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Timothy Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Timothy Daniels v. U.S. Penitentiary Warden
as 14-40507
Petitioner - Appellant:
TIMOTHY DANIELS
Respondent - Appellee:
USP WARDEN
Daniels v. USA
as 4:2014cv00271
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Timothy Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Daniels v. USP Warden
as 1:2014cv00132
Petitioner:
Timothy Daniels
Respondent:
USP Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Keith Jones v. Tucker Communications Inc., et al
as 13-15712
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH JONES, Individually and on Behalf of All Similarly Situated Individuals
Defendant - Appellee:
TUCKER COMMUNICATIONS INC. and TIMOTHY DANIEL TUCKER, President, CEO, and co-owner of Tucker Communication, Inc., in his individual capacity
Daniels v. Madison County Jail
as 1:2013cv01334
Plaintiff:
Timothy Daniels
Defendant:
Madison County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv00041
Plaintiff:
Timothy Daniels
Defendant:
United States of America
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
U.S. Bank National Association v. Daniels et al
as 1:2012cv08403
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
Timothy Daniels, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as a Nominee for Fremont Investment & Loan, Newbury Estates of Matteson Homesowners Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Mortgage Foreclosure
Frieson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2012cv01320
Plaintiff:
Timothy Daniel Frieson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BAUMAN et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv04576
Plaintiff:
LEDDURE RASHAD BAUMAN , VERONICA BAUMAN , JOHN W. BEASLEY and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE , NFL PROPERTIES LLC , RIDDELL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
