Cases 51 - 60 of 164
Bonneau v. Painter et al
as 3:2018cv01201
Defendant:
Unknown Portland Police Officer 1, Unknown Portland Police Policymaker, Eileen Groshong and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Bonneau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Todd v. State of Washington Attorney General's Office et al
as 2:2018cv00720
Plaintiff:
Jerome Eugene Todd
Defendant:
State of Washington Attorney General's Office, Ye Ting Woo, James Robart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anglin v. Hudgins et al
as 1:2018cv00853
Petitioner:
Lee Anglin
Respondent:
Richard Hudgins, Janet Perdue and U.S. Probation Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wright v. United States of America
as 4:2018cv00829
Petitioner:
Alfred Domenick Wright
Respondent:
Director Lexington County Detention Center and U.S. Probation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Shoulders v. Dubose et al
as 3:2018cv00553
Plaintiff:
Emanuel L. Shoulders
Defendant:
Warden Dubose, Supervisor U.S. Probation Department, Southern District of Ohio and Supervisor U.S. Probation Department, Northern District of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Westine v. Charles Daniels, et al
as 18-1405
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN G. WESTINE
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES A. DANIELS, Warden and U.S. PROBATION
Zambrella v. Ward et al
as 6:2017cv00233
Petitioner:
Taurus Zambrella
Respondent:
Ward, FBOP and U.S. Probation Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
David Atwood, II v. USA, et al
as 17-56010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID GARLAND ATWOOD II
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and U.S. PROBATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01320
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Atwood II v. United States of America et al
as 3:2017cv01315
Plaintiff:
David Garland Atwood II
Defendant:
United States of America and U.S. Probation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
