Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 97,438
Brinson v. Warden, FCI Jesup
as 2:2024cv00068
Petitioner: Raheem T. Brinson
Respondent: Warden, FCI Jesup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Davis v. West et al
as 6:2024cv00024
Plaintiff: Louis Davis
Defendant: Warden Mr. West and Brinden Murry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. WIZA
as 4:2024cv00071
Petitioner: FABIAN WOODS, JR
Respondent: Warden SCOTT WIZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
AMERSON v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00149
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER L AMERSON
Defendant: COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER, DEPUTY WARDEN DERRICK MCDANIEL, DEPUTY WARDEN CURTIS L JEFFERIES, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CALLANTINE v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00183
Petitioner: ZACHARY W. CALLANTINE
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCMULLIN v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00184
Petitioner: SHAWN MCMULLIN
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
OLUWADAMILARE v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv06201
Petitioner: ADELKE B. OLUWADAMILARE
Respondent: WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kocevar v. Swartz
as 3:2024cv00876
Petitioner: Peyton Kocevar
Defendant: Warden Michael Swartz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hamilton v. Rule
as 4:2024cv00449
Petitioner: Brenda Hamilton
Respondent: Warden FNU Rule
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Felix v. Warden, USP Lee
as 7:2024cv00321
Petitioner: Benjamin Arellano Felix
Respondent: Warden, USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?