Cases 51 - 60 of 153
Gabb v. Austin
as 3:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Gabb
Defendant:
Warden Austin, Dr. Tran, John or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Maryland Attorney General
as 1:2022cv00075
Petitioner:
Tavon Williams
Respondent:
Maryland Attorney General and Warden Thomas Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Malmstrom et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv00030
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Malmstrom, Robert Collins, MD Joseph Esposito and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Davis v. Wolfe et al
as 1:2021cv03003
Plaintiff:
Glenn Davis
Defendant:
Warden Thomas Wolfe, Former Warden Cleveland Friday and Former Chief Antonette Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Manuel Best v. Thomas Wolfe
as 21-7525
Petitioner / Appellant:
MANUEL BEST
Respondent / Appellee:
ACTING WARDEN THOMAS WOLFE and MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL
Dowdy v. Foley
as 1:2021cv01933
Petitioner:
Shawn E. Dowdy and Shaun E. Dowdy
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Foley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DAVIS v. BERGAMI
as 1:2021cv15868
Plaintiff:
DONALD LEWIS DAVIS
Defendant:
WARDEN THOMAS E. BERGAMI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Atkinson et al
as 9:2021cv02526
Plaintiff:
Lawrence L Crawford and Johah Gabriel Jahjah T Tishbite
Defendant:
Officer Ms. Atkinson, Officer Ms. Kee, Acting Head Nurse Over Lee C.I at Night and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Witherspoon v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 5:2021ct03131
Defendant:
Tamara S. Lyn, Richard Engel, Warden Thomas Scarantino and others
Plaintiff:
Shontonio Witherspoon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tubbs v. Attorney General of the State of Ohio
as 4:2021cv00925
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Ohio and Warden Thomas Schweitzer
Petitioner:
Jermaine Tubbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
